Research Ethics Board of Canada Essay

There argon many rules that must be adhered to when describing a course of ethics. The purpose of this reading, Ethics, was to inform readers of the rules and regulations set forth by the Research Ethics Board of Canada. The ethics board keeps a close watch over matters of all types of human research. The given selection brand name obvious the Canadian governments involvement in the research practices of its countrymen, and also the governments commitment to keeping human research work ethically sound.The Research Ethics Board of Canada, or the REB, must be consulted in every instance of research involving human subjects (p. 3). Part of their job is to make sure that the safety of the living research subjects is held in high esteem. They also provide a intelligibly moral foundation for research practices (p. 54). The REB is not limited to cases of research on the living. Even in the case of deceased bodies, the REB requires that respect is in order due to the dignity of the person from whom wander is obtained (p. 76).Regarding the ethical treatment of the living and the dead, the REB has the utmost say so in what can or cannot be done with a human body, and their opinions supersede those of the researchers (p. 3). The REB pull offs laboratory practices, but they also oversee ethical treatment of humans in the public sector as well. In the public sector, celebrities and sports figures are often hounded by reporters and photographers. The REB, however, protects near of their privacy by including in their general policies rules roughly research on living people in the public arena (p. 1).The REB does not regulate research about people who fall into this classification unless the subject is approached directly for interviews or for access to private papers (p. 1). When much(prenominal) requests occur, the REB must step in and confirm that the research is being done ethically and in accordance with policy (p. 1). One could safely assume that most people wan ting information for unethical purposes would be dissuaded by the measure of justification the REB provides. The REB may just have a general measure of authority in research in the public sector, but in some research situations, they assume a great amount of control.In cases of extremely invasive or potentially harmful research, the REB must assess, monitor, and review each case with intense scrutiny (p. 9). The REB in lineamenticular monitors cases that are the most ethically challenging (p. 9). Some of these cases may include situations where children are involved. Potential physical, moral, psychological, and kindly consequences must be provided for review by the REB before research on a child, particularly a very sick child, can be approved (p. 28).Even if the research is approved, the REB gives the final decision about the research to the person who will be undergoing it. The REB works with people who unremarkably would not be able to indicate consent, such as young child ren, Alzheimers patients, and the cognitively stricken (p. 29). In the interest of ethical behavior, if the person indicates that they do not want to take part in the research, the REB will step in and remove them from the situation. Even though the REB is a political agency, they still have control over what happens medically to the most frail and innocent patients.It would be unethical to include a person in a study that they did not choose to take part in, so in the name of ethics the REB stops researchers from taking advantage of perilous situations. The protection of the people of Canada is the main job of the REB. Even though some people are opposed to political intrusion into areas of health and ethical treatment, the REB is a good example of appropriate governmental discourse into such research. Canada has an excellent model for the rest of the world.